New Article Interface
A way of viewing journal articles in tabs.
Journal articles often run several screens long when viewed online, requiring readers to scroll up and down to view different parts of the article.
By dividing the article content across tabs, it may be easier to navigate.
If you have other thoughts or suggestions related to this idea, please e-mail them to beta@nejm.org.
Reviews
Average Rating for This Feature:
based on 25 reviews.
Write a Review for This Feature
07/18/2009
| md |
| Pros: it provides easier article reviewing |
| Cons: a bit slower loading than old-fashioned, at least on my Vista :( |
| Reviewer: Anonymous Professional Specialty: Unspecified Place of Work or Study: Unspecified |
07/12/2009
 More tabs please... |
| Pros: The tabs saves time and adds useful links to reader such as articles that cite the article and the correspondence. |
| Cons: The lack of usefulness of only two tabs - abstract and article. The subsections of the article needs to be separated in individual tabs. |
| Reviewer: Robson Alberto Professional Specialty: Emergency Medicine Place of Work or Study: Non-Profit Organization |
06/04/2009
 Tab limitations |
| Pros: Here a new tabbed interface is provided to the journal article, in which different parts of the article can be selected using tabs, thereby attempting to break away from the traditional linear narrative. |
| Cons: Disappointingly, these tabs are presently limited to ‘Abstract’, ‘Article’ and ‘References’, with no breakdown of the article into Introduction, Methods, Results, etc., and these tabs scroll out of sight when reading down the page. |
| Other thoughts: The equivalent sectional functionality provided by the non-scrolling link set at the top of the enhanced PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases article (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000228.x001), described by Shotton et al. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000361), provides much better functionality, in terms of having higher granularity and being non-scrolling, while occupying less screen real-estate. |
| Reviewer: Dr David Shotton, University of Oxford Professional Specialty: Other Place of Work or Study: Other |
11/08/2008
 imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia |
| Pros: |
| Cons: |
| Reviewer: imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia Professional Specialty: Hematology/Oncology Place of Work or Study: Research Facility |
10/26/2008
| Much Better Reference Access |
| Pros: The pop-ups for footnotes/references alone makes this system an improvement. The present system requires jumping up and down the screen to view references. |
| Cons: I'm not sure how well this would work on mobile devices. |
| Other thoughts: What about a tab for "Related Articles" (ie. editorials)? |
| Reviewer: S.Kirk, MD Professional Specialty: General Internal Medicine Place of Work or Study: Private Physician Office (group) |
10/01/2008
| New interface |
| Pros: Fine in computers |
| Cons: Very bad in my iPod |
| Other thoughts: Look for an interface to iPods |
| Reviewer: Ernesto Professional Specialty: General Internal Medicine Place of Work or Study: Medical School Program |
08/26/2008
| excellent job |
| Pros: simple idea makes a great tool, really groundbreaking in the scientific literature |
| Cons: in the summaries, the audio is clearly not tailored on the slides. It would be great to have slides illustrated by a pointer focusing on the message of the slide. |
| Other thoughts: it would be nice to have for the i-phone, but I am not sure the i-phone has the proper flash features yet |
| Reviewer: Roberto Testi Professional Specialty: Allergy/Immunology Place of Work or Study: Medical School Program |
08/21/2008
| gg |
| Pros: |
| Cons: |
| Reviewer: Anonymous Professional Specialty: Unspecified Place of Work or Study: Unspecified |
08/18/2008
| New Article Interface |
| Pros: In an ideal world would be great but... |
| Cons: normally we don't have enough time to read a paragraph, it's better to have a menu and choose the abstract to read. |
| Other thoughts: and also it occupies a lot of space in a screen that is supposed to show lot of information in 1-click |
| Reviewer: Silvana Novelli Professional Specialty: Hematology/Oncology Place of Work or Study: Hospital, Community |
06/18/2008
| Improvement |
| Pros: Easier to navigate fast between sections. Less scrolling. |
| Cons: |
| Other thoughts: Pictures "full size" should be a tab. This design has been used for PDA programs - and that is a great feature. Scrolling is easier on computers, but i think most would appreciate this possibility |
| Reviewer: Anonymous Professional Specialty: Unspecified Place of Work or Study: Other |
Read All Reviews (25)
This content requires the Adobe Flash Player.
Click Here to Get Flash
