NEJM beta: New Interface

New Article Interface

A way of viewing journal articles in tabs.

Journal articles often run several screens long when viewed online, requiring readers to scroll up and down to view different parts of the article. By dividing the article content across tabs, it may be easier to navigate.

If you have other thoughts or suggestions related to this idea, please e-mail them to beta@nejm.org.



Reviews


Average Rating for This Feature:     based on 25 reviews.
Write a Review for This Feature

07/18/2009

md
Pros: it provides easier article reviewing
Cons: a bit slower loading than old-fashioned, at least on my Vista :(
Reviewer: Anonymous
Professional Specialty: Unspecified
Place of Work or Study: Unspecified

report as inappropriate

07/12/2009

More tabs please...
Pros: The tabs saves time and adds useful links to reader such as articles that cite the article and the correspondence.
Cons: The lack of usefulness of only two tabs - abstract and article. The subsections of the article needs to be separated in individual tabs.
Reviewer: Robson Alberto
Professional Specialty: Emergency Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Non-Profit Organization

report as inappropriate

06/04/2009

Tab limitations
Pros: Here a new tabbed interface is provided to the journal article, in which different parts of the article can be selected using tabs, thereby attempting to break away from the traditional linear narrative.
Cons: Disappointingly, these tabs are presently limited to ‘Abstract’, ‘Article’ and ‘References’, with no breakdown of the article into Introduction, Methods, Results, etc., and these tabs scroll out of sight when reading down the page.
Other thoughts: The equivalent sectional functionality provided by the non-scrolling link set at the top of the enhanced PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases article (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000228.x001), described by Shotton et al. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000361), provides much better functionality, in terms of having higher granularity and being non-scrolling, while occupying less screen real-estate.
Reviewer: Dr David Shotton, University of Oxford
Professional Specialty: Other
Place of Work or Study: Other

report as inappropriate

11/08/2008

imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia
Pros:
Cons:
Reviewer: imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia
Professional Specialty: Hematology/Oncology
Place of Work or Study: Research Facility

report as inappropriate

10/26/2008

Much Better Reference Access
Pros: The pop-ups for footnotes/references alone makes this system an improvement. The present system requires jumping up and down the screen to view references.
Cons: I'm not sure how well this would work on mobile devices.
Other thoughts: What about a tab for "Related Articles" (ie. editorials)?
Reviewer: S.Kirk, MD
Professional Specialty: General Internal Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Private Physician Office (group)

report as inappropriate

10/01/2008

New interface
Pros: Fine in computers
Cons: Very bad in my iPod
Other thoughts: Look for an interface to iPods
Reviewer: Ernesto
Professional Specialty: General Internal Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Medical School Program

report as inappropriate

08/26/2008

excellent job
Pros: simple idea makes a great tool, really groundbreaking in the scientific literature
Cons: in the summaries, the audio is clearly not tailored on the slides. It would be great to have slides illustrated by a pointer focusing on the message of the slide.
Other thoughts: it would be nice to have for the i-phone, but I am not sure the i-phone has the proper flash features yet
Reviewer: Roberto Testi
Professional Specialty: Allergy/Immunology
Place of Work or Study: Medical School Program

report as inappropriate

08/21/2008

gg
Pros:
Cons:
Reviewer: Anonymous
Professional Specialty: Unspecified
Place of Work or Study: Unspecified

report as inappropriate

08/18/2008

New Article Interface
Pros: In an ideal world would be great but...
Cons: normally we don't have enough time to read a paragraph, it's better to have a menu and choose the abstract to read.
Other thoughts: and also it occupies a lot of space in a screen that is supposed to show lot of information in 1-click
Reviewer: Silvana Novelli
Professional Specialty: Hematology/Oncology
Place of Work or Study: Hospital, Community

report as inappropriate

06/18/2008

Improvement
Pros: Easier to navigate fast between sections. Less scrolling.
Cons:
Other thoughts: Pictures "full size" should be a tab. This design has been used for PDA programs - and that is a great feature. Scrolling is easier on computers, but i think most would appreciate this possibility
Reviewer: Anonymous
Professional Specialty: Unspecified
Place of Work or Study: Other

report as inappropriate

06/15/2008

New Article Interface
Pros: much easier way to navigate through the information
Cons:
Other thoughts: I suggest the article itself have tabs for each section, methods, results, discussion, etc.
Reviewer: J. McMillan MD
Professional Specialty: Women’s Health
Place of Work or Study: Private Physician Office (group)

report as inappropriate

04/28/2008

Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Women
Pros: Excellent easy way for rapid navigation through any article
Cons: No Cons
Reviewer: Amoun Louis Wahba Boutros
Professional Specialty: Other
Place of Work or Study: Hospital, Other

report as inappropriate

04/25/2008

New article interface an improvement
Pros: Concise information on one screen.
Cons:
Reviewer: Dr Ian MacDonald
Professional Specialty: Family Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Private Physician Office (group)

report as inappropriate

04/25/2008

-
Pros: easy, a good idea
Cons:
Reviewer: Dr. Mario Spinello
Professional Specialty: Gastroenterology
Place of Work or Study: Hospital, Other

report as inappropriate

04/25/2008

Tabs
Pros: I like the idea of being able to choose what I want to view.
Cons: Awkward navigation.
Other thoughts: I agree with the person who commented on having to scroll back up to view other options. Can you put tabs at the bottom as well and have it bring you back to the beginning of another option?
Reviewer: Yvonne Sargent
Professional Specialty: Other
Place of Work or Study: HMO

report as inappropriate

04/25/2008

Tab viewing
Pros:
Cons:
Other thoughts: In hard copy of the Journal all new article should start on odd page and and on even page. At the end of the year it is easy to tear the the journal and file the article by subject rather than binding whole one year journal. makes search difficult.
Reviewer: Dr.Bankim J .Amin
Professional Specialty: Pulmonology
Place of Work or Study: Hospital, University or Teaching

report as inappropriate

04/25/2008

New Article Interface
Pros: Great idea.
Cons:
Other thoughts: Maybe the tabs could be at the side of the atricle half way down, to avoid having to scroll upp. Having images with their own tabs would be very helpful,
Reviewer: A White MD FRCPC
Professional Specialty: General Internal Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Medical School Program

report as inappropriate

04/07/2008

Idea!
Pros: It makes navigation easier than before but
Cons: if you want to read the next section of the article, you hace to scroll all the way up.
Other thoughts: My suggestion is to keep this new tabs where they are, at the top of the article's website but, instead of locating article's sections in different pages and having to click on the tabs to read them, you can just place all then article in one page, which allows a complete viewing of the content of the article, and keep the tabs above just as marker hyperlinks. Thanks.
Reviewer: Daniel E. Pleguezuelo
Professional Specialty: Other
Place of Work or Study: Medical School Program

report as inappropriate

03/14/2008

Question ease of printing
Pros: Indeed the new format make it easier to make an initial connection to a specific section of the article.
Cons: Once you have accessed your initial selection it is just as easy to scroll to a new section as to go back and click another link. This feature adds negligible benefit in my opinion.
Other thoughts: Also, it is not clear how to print out the full article including references. Would the reader have to reopen in PDF format?
Reviewer: Kristi Wells
Professional Specialty: Other
Place of Work or Study: Private Physician Office (group)

report as inappropriate

03/10/2008

AJAX because we can AJAX
Pros: tabs add quicker flow between sections
Cons: These look like one of nearly a thousand Ajax style tabs that have been popping up. The square interface adds nothing to look. A better styled "fold out" flex style box would expand the content on the page without having to "navigate" to a new section at all. With a better overall look.
Other thoughts: good overall
Reviewer: Isaac Huffman
Professional Specialty: Other
Place of Work or Study: Hospital, Community

report as inappropriate

03/10/2008

good idea!
Pros: it´s very useful a good idea
Cons:
Reviewer: Francisco Lacruz
Professional Specialty: Neurology/Neurosurgery
Place of Work or Study: Hospital, University or Teaching

report as inappropriate

03/09/2008

New Article Interface
Pros: -Saves Time and Streamlines review of references -Letters/Opinion -Format
Cons: None
Other thoughts: Curious to have a better understanding of the timing of submission and response in the letters session
Reviewer: Tom Manos
Professional Specialty: Other
Place of Work or Study: Pharmaceutical Company

report as inappropriate

02/25/2008

Very good!!!
Pros: Nice presentation and will be more practice.
Cons: Nothing
Reviewer: Matheus Abreu
Professional Specialty: General Internal Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Medical School Program

report as inappropriate

02/20/2008

Tabbed article
Pros: Easy navigation; easy "jump."
Cons: None.
Other thoughts: Consider including tabs for tables and images also (while retaining their original links in the body of the article.)
Reviewer: Oguchi Nkwocha, MD.
Professional Specialty: Family Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Other

report as inappropriate

02/20/2008

Assistant Professor
Pros: Great idea to streamline the article
Cons: The main obstacle to smoothly reading an article is the figures that force you to navigate away. If you're going to introduce tabs, I'd say make hitting a figure open it in a tab. Then tabbing back to article takes you back.
Reviewer: Bob Kalus
Professional Specialty: Emergency Medicine
Place of Work or Study: Hospital, University or Teaching

report as inappropriate


Collapse

This content requires the Adobe Flash Player.
Click Here to Get Flash

THIS WEEK IN NEJM

COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS? PLEASE CONTACT US.

THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE IS OWNED, PUBLISHED, AND COPYRIGHTED © MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETY.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.